Model Evaluasi Kinerja Pustakawan Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Profesionalisme Pustakawan di PTKIN

Authors

  • Sulaiman Sulaiman Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Suprapto Suprapto Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Keywords:

Evaluation Model, Librarian Performance, Librarian Professionalism

Abstract

The research aims to (1) Evaluate librarians' competencies, especially within PTKIN. (2) Formulate a librarian competency development program at PTKIN. Research is evaluation research. The research used kuisioner as  instrument to  measure self-evaluating librarian competencies. Based on the literature review, librarian self-evaluation indicators are self-concept, work motivation and librarian performance. Self-concept is measured through 17 questions, work motivation is measured through 7 questions and librarian's performance is measured through 47 questions. The Research  is done at Sunan Ampel Surabaya UIN, Malang Sunan Malik Ibrahim UIN, Kediri IAIN, Tulungagung IAIN and Ponorogo IAIN. The results of the librarian's self-evaluation showed that the librarians with very positive self-concept were 41% and the positive self-concept was 59%. Librarians who have very high motivation are 41%, high motivation is 41%, low motivation is 15% and motivation is very low 2%. Librarians who have low performance are 2.2%, moderate performers are 32.6%, high performers are 37%, and very high performers are 28.3%. The performance of librarians who are still weak is information technology literacy, conducting library research and writing scientific papers and publishing them in scientific journals / forums.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. (2001). Kinerja. In Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia (p. 1277). Balai Pustaka.

Faryd, I. P. (2016). Penerapan kode etik pustakawan di Perpustakaan Utsman Bin Affan Universitas Muslim Indonesia Makassar. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.

Hasugian, J. (2009). Dasar-dasar ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi. Medan: USU press.

Hermawan, R., & Zen, Z. (2006). Etika kepustakawanan: Suatu pendekatan terhadap profesi dan kode etik pustakawan Indonesia. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.

Indonesia. Perpustakaan Nasional. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 43 tahun 2007 Tentang Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional.

Laksono, B. D. (2011). Kualitas pelayanan perpustakaan berdasarkan indeks kepuasan masyanakat di Badan Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur. UPN Surabaya.

Lasa Hs. (2009). Profesionalisme pustakawan dalam perspektif Islam. UNILIB: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 2(1), 64–74.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Priyanto, S. (n.d.). Problematika profesionalitas pustakawan: Ditinjau dari aspek normatif dan sosial. Retrieved from http://eprints.undip.ac.id/49301/1/Problematika_profesional_pust.pdf

Sulaiman. (2017). Analisis profil dan tingkat kepuasan pemustaka di Perpustakaan Pusat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pelayanan perpustakaaan. Surabaya.

Tim Penyusun Modul Sistem AKIP. (2007).

Uswah, L. K. (2014). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dalam Optimalisasi Kinerja Perpustakaan. Libraria, 3(1).

Wirawan, W. (2009). Evaluasi kinerja sumber daya manusia: Teori, aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-28

How to Cite

Sulaiman, S., & Suprapto, S. (2019). Model Evaluasi Kinerja Pustakawan Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Profesionalisme Pustakawan di PTKIN. IJAL (Indonesian Journal of Academic Librarianship), 2(2), 51–64. Retrieved from http://journals.apptisjatim.org/index.php/ijal/article/view/47

Issue

Section

Articles